Roger Ver, a pioneer of Bitcoin 
$104,193 Cash and an early crypto adopter, asserts that the U.S. government has been undermining Bitcoin since 2011. He notes a surge in media interest for Bitcoin coincided with the Bitcointalk.org forum being flooded with bots during that same week.
Education and Intelligence Interventions
In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, Ver expressed that rendering Bitcointalk.org unusable was a deliberate act. He highlighted that the disabling of this early BTC forum aimed to hinder the spread of Bitcoin.
“By 2011, the forum had become entirely dysfunctional. We know the CIA was interested in Bitcoin because they asked various Bitcoin developers, ‘Can you explain Bitcoin to us?’ While most of the world was still unaware of Bitcoin, the CIA was investigating it and actively preventing its rapid spread by shutting down the forum.”
As an early investor who supported the fork to Bitcoin Cash, Ver claims U.S. intelligence agencies propagated the notion that keeping BTC block sizes small was essential. He argues that this propaganda obstructed the Bitcoin network’s ability to perform faster and cheaper transactions.
Arrest and Tax Allegations
At the end of April, Roger Ver was arrested in Spain at the request of the U.S. Department of Justice. He faces various charges, including mail fraud, tax evasion, and filing false tax returns. Despite renouncing his U.S. citizenship in 2014, authorities allege that Ver failed to report capital gains from sales of his global assets and did not declare the market value of his holdings.
These developments have sparked significant reactions in the crypto community, raising new questions about the role and influence of the U.S. government in the ongoing debates between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
Ver’s claims shed light on the various challenges faced during the early days of cryptocurrencies and the potential impacts of government interventions. This situation emerges as a crucial topic regarding the future of digital assets and the preservation of decentralization principles.
As the crypto community assesses Ver’s statements, they emphasize that beyond technological advancements, political and social dynamics can significantly shape the crypto ecosystem. In this context, the necessity for more transparent and inclusive policies for the sustainability and adoption of cryptocurrencies comes to the forefront.
The ongoing conflict between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash illustrates the dynamic nature of cryptocurrency markets, revealing not only technological innovations but also the barriers encountered in the adoption process. The interactions among users, developers, and regulators play a critical role in shaping the future of digital assets.
