Senators Push for Clarity on Crypto Staking Policies

The SEC has become more crypto-friendly, initiating steps to resolve several issues. The Coinbase lawsuit is nearing its end, while the case against Binance has been suspended. However, more actions are required. Today’s hack at ByBit may lead to a renewed downturn, but an overdue rise is anticipated. What actions are Senators taking?

Staking and the Crypto Bull Market

Chair Gary Gensler had firmly opposed crypto staking. However, the new administration considers the topic debatable. This matter emerged during discussions with various crypto stakeholders at the beginning of February. Now, Senator Lummis is taking action for cryptocurrencies.

A letter was sent to the SEC requesting evaluation and clarification on the staking issue related to cryptocurrencies. If the SEC permits staking for ETF issuers, it could mean immense annual profits, increasing investor interest in ETFs. An investor acquiring a $100,000 ETH ETF could earn $5,000 annually, plus profits from ETH price appreciation—a good ratio.

Moreover, consider the potential for double-digit annual staking returns for altcoins. Investors would not only be betting on long-term asset appreciation but also generate a steady income stream. This prospect is enticing for many hedge funds, pension funds, and others.

Letter to the SEC Regarding Crypto

Lummis and several senators sent a letter to the SEC requesting clarity on staking restrictions for cryptocurrencies. Signatories included Senator Cynthia Lummis, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Senators Steve Daines (R-MT), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), and Bernie Moreno (R-OH). This represents bipartisan support from both Democratic and Republican parties.

The senators stated, “The lack of protocol staking opportunities for these issuers significantly impacts the investment potential of crypto asset ETPs in the U.S., challenging the competitive position of U.S. asset managers in the global market.”

The letter specifically requests the SEC to address the following points:

• The analysis used to restrict protocol stakes from certain S-1 filings.
• Defined opportunities and risks associated with protocol staking.
• The rationale for prohibiting staking in securities.

The letter requests a response from the SEC by March 21, 2025.