Türkçe
Español
Over 20 out of the 50 states in the U.S. have proposed plans to invest public funds into digital assets, such as Bitcoin 
$104,031. However, in recent weeks, several states have seen these proposals halted due to unfavorable outcomes in legislative votes.
State Decision Processes
Montana’s proposal aimed to allocate up to $50 million in public funds towards Bitcoin, stablecoins, and precious metals. Introduced in July, it faced a setback when it was rejected by the Montana House of Representatives with a vote of 59-41. Similarly, South Dakota’s HB 1202, which proposed a 10% fund allocation, failed in the relevant subcommittee with a 9-3 vote against it.
North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming also presented similar proposals that did not garner the necessary support during legislative processes. North Dakota’s HB 1184 was rejected with a 57-32 vote, while proposals in Pennsylvania and Wyoming either stalled at various stages or were completely withdrawn.
Emerging Developments and Other States
In contrast, states like Utah, Texas, Oklahoma, and Arizona are making headway with innovative approaches. Utah’s Blockchain and Digital Innovation Amendments Bill received positive votes in the revenue and taxation subcommittee, potentially allowing for a 5% allocation of public funds to cryptocurrency assets once approvals are finalized. Texas has gained attention with two separate proposals, including one that suggests allocating 1% of the general revenue fund to digital assets and another addressing Bitcoin donations and digital payment conversions.
In the Oklahoma House of Representatives, HB 1203 is progressing with a 12-2 vote in favor of a strategic Bitcoin reserve, while Arizona’s Senate Finance Committee has introduced SB 1025, which aims to allocate 10% of public funds towards digital assets. The ongoing discussions around approximately 18 different proposals across various states highlight the continuing debate over the potential use of cryptocurrencies in public finance.
While some states are experiencing setbacks with their proposals, others continue to progress with new regulations. The votes and discussions taking place in legislative chambers reveal the varying approaches to how digital assets might play a role in managing public funds.
