Türkçe
Español
Elon Musk, former head of the Government Efficiency Department (DOGE), publicly opposed U.S. President Donald Trump’s economic proposal following his resignation. Through various social media posts, Musk expressed that the comprehensive budget and spending plan devised by Trump poses significant economic risks for America. He called upon U.S. citizens and lawmakers to advocate for the cancellation of this proposal.
Elon Musk’s Strong Criticisms
Musk claimed that the controversial bill would drive America towards bankruptcy. In his statements on platform X, he encouraged citizens to contact their Senators and Representatives, expressing that leading America to bankruptcy is unacceptable, and the proposal must be abolished. Musk argued that the bill contained massive and unnecessary expenditures which he found deplorable.
“I’ve been as patient as I can, but this Congress bill full of expenses is a disgrace. Those who vote for it should be ashamed; they know very well they’re in the wrong.”
Musk believes that the bill’s notable budget deficit and public debt increase are out of control. He asserted that in its current form, the proposal would raise the U.S. debt ceiling by approximately $5 trillion. Musk deemed this unacceptable and emphasized the need for a new bill that would not increase the debt burden.
“A spending bill that increases the debt ceiling by $5 trillion and expands the budget deficit should be revised.”
Trump vs Musk
Elon Musk’s criticisms caught the attention of Trump and his team. According to reports from NBC News, Trump expressed disappointment in a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, suggesting that Musk was aware of the bill’s details.
“I was surprised by Elon’s reaction because he knew the proposal’s details. There are issues with electric vehicle incentives, and we’re asked for billions of dollars. He knew this from the start.”
Musk, regarding Trump’s influence over the administration, stated that without his support, the election results might have been different. This highlights Musk’s significant influence and public presence in American politics.
“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would control the House, and Republicans would be behind 51-49 in the Senate.”
Under Musk’s leadership, the DOGE department previously worked towards efficient public resource usage. However, Musk argues that the state continues to waste resources and that significant productivity changes are necessary to overcome the economic bottleneck. According to Musk, the increasing public debt and budget deficit threaten financial sustainability in the U.S.
Trump’s bill is notably criticized for removing incentives for electric vehicles and increasing public spending. While Musk and Trump express differing perspectives on the bill, the involvement of tech companies and business people in politics is under scrutiny. This situation is seen as an example of how policy and economic decisions resonate among various groups in the U.S.
In his recent statement at 23:00, Trump declared;
“I don’t care if Elon takes a stance against me, but he should have done this months ago. This is one of the most important bills presented to Congress. A record spending cut of $1.6 trillion and the biggest tax break given yet. If this bill doesn’t pass, there will be a 68% tax increase, and much worse will happen. I didn’t create this mess; I’m here to fix it. This will put our country on the path to victory.” – Truth Social
Musk recently supported a call for Trump’s impeachment by quoting someone who said it should happen and adding “yes.” Tensions between the two are expected to escalate, especially following Musk’s comments regarding “Trump in the Epstein file.”
It is suggested that bills significantly increasing public spending and particularly affecting technology sector incentives should be reassessed. To ensure a sound fiscal balance in the U.S. economy, it’s anticipated that diverse opinions will be considered, and efforts towards transparency and balance in legal regulations will continue. The ongoing debate has highlighted the public’s demand for constructive, long-term solutions from the government in light of the growing debt burden.
