Türkçe
Español
Under the leadership of Elon Musk, the D.O.G.E. department has brought blockchain technology into the spotlight for monitoring public spending in the United States. Within this framework, the potential preference for Cardano 
$0.752409 has sparked various opinions among community members. Essentially, we can say that the Cardano community is actively working to generate such speculation.
Technological Compatibility and Efficiency
Following his appointment, Elon Musk made statements regarding the integration of blockchain. There are views suggesting that the new structure could provide efficiency in tracking public expenditures. Community members claim that Cardano possesses more advanced decentralized technologies.
Darren Kelly: “I advocate that expenditures should be transparent on the public ledger.”
Cardano’s long-standing operational experience, innovative approaches, and compliance with regulations are highlighted as significant factors. These attributes are seen as crucial for aligning with the department’s goals.
Cardano Seeks a Slice of the Pie
Other blockchain projects have also been part of the discussion. Ethereum 
$1,940 is evaluated for its extensive user base related to smart contract infrastructure. Meanwhile, Solana 
$135 continues to be supported by different communities despite past ups and downs.
Cardano’s technological advantages are bolstered by developments such as the innovative Plomin hard fork. The project is thought to play a role in achieving transparency and democratization goals in public management.
Charles Hoskinson: “I offered support to D.O.G.E.”
The price of Cardano’s cryptocurrency, ADA, has been increasing as developments continue to be closely monitored. According to analyses, if the project is officially adopted, there could be positive changes in ADA’s value. However, Elon Musk could also opt for a completely independent blockchain.
There are various opinions regarding the selection of technology to be used in the project. Cardano’s long-standing reliable operational history, community-supported innovations, and regulatory compliance are among the standout features compared to other alternatives. Careful evaluation of the selected technology is thought to be beneficial for the transparent tracking of public expenditures.
