The Federal Reserve is widely anticipated to keep its policy rate unchanged at next week’s meeting, with market estimates assigning an 88% probability to a hold and just 12% to a 25 basis point increase, according to the CME FedWatch tool. This decision comes as officials confront persistent inflation, rising oil prices, and signs of slowing job growth, leaving policymakers divided between tightening further or pausing for now.
Analysts split on timing and direction of next move
Traders and analysts have closely tracked the possible outcomes since the Fed’s rate hike in September, when inflationary pressures began to rise anew. A recent note by UBS, one of the world’s largest investment banks, identified an unchanged October rate as its core expectation but suggested targeted tightening could follow. In contrast, futures markets have priced in a more aggressive tightening path than UBS anticipates.
Investors remain focused on Chair Kevin Warsh’s communications for any clues about the likelihood of another increase in December, as well as the Fed’s stance on balancing inflation risks with softening labor market conditions. However, Warsh has resisted providing the forward guidance favored by some of his predecessors.
Speaking in Bangkok on October 16, Warsh stated, “I don’t prejudge meetings. I don’t believe in saying now what I might do at the meetings that we have in the balance of this year.”
Warsh has consistently maintained that the Fed is not in the business of forward guidance, avoiding early commitments to future moves. This stance has left investors paying close attention to the Fed’s statement wording, voting record, and press conference for potential signals on future policy.
The upcoming meeting will not feature a new Summary of Economic Projections, leaving investors without updated interest rate forecasts. Tracy Shuchart, Senior Economist at NinjaTrader, and Patrick Boyle, a finance professor and former hedge fund manager, both expect the statement’s language—especially regarding labor market assessments—to assume added importance.
A change in wording from “solid” to “softened” on labor conditions, for example, could indicate the Fed’s shifting view in response to weaker jobs data from September. Boyle highlighted that a dissenting vote within the committee could also signal growing debate around the path for December.
JoAnne Bianco, Senior Investment Strategist at BondBloxx, said the focus should shift from the immediate rate decision to whether the Fed keeps the door open to further tightening, particularly depending on how Warsh characterizes current inflation.
Inflation outlook shaped by energy prices and supply shocks
September’s consumer price index figures revealed that US consumer prices rose 0.6% month-on-month, pushing annual headline inflation up to 3.7%, driven partly by a 9.1% surge in gasoline. Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, ticked up 0.3% monthly and reached 2.6% year over year.
Producer prices added to concern, with a 1.3% monthly rise surpassing forecasts and marking the largest jump in more than four years. Brent crude oil hovered near $113 per barrel, reflecting worries over Middle East supply disruptions.
Economists highlighted the challenge this poses for policymakers. Traditional rate hikes cannot directly counteract supply-driven energy price shocks, and higher borrowing costs may dampen economic activity without alleviating household energy costs.
Shuchart has argued that the September inflation report complicates the Fed’s longstanding view that oil-related price spikes are temporary. She pointed to the acceleration in core CPI and the risk that energy costs are filtering into broader services and goods prices.
“The Fed is tightening into a supply shock with a hiring stall underneath it,” Shuchart cautioned, underscoring the difficulty in interpreting recent data as simply transitory.
Rebecca Homkes, Economist and Lecturer at London Business School, described interest rates as an “incredibly blunt tool” for these supply shocks and indicated that policy assumptions should account for the possibility of continued disruptions.
Robert R. Johnson, Finance Professor at Creighton University, challenged the notion that inflation pressures are only temporary, citing ongoing trade policy and geopolitical conflicts as persistent sources of price increases.
Labor market slowdown adds pressure to Fed’s balancing act
The Fed’s other major concern is the labor market. US employers added 29,000 jobs in September, significantly below expectations of 90,000, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.2%. Revised July and August data resulted in 60,000 fewer jobs added than previously reported.
Shuchart identified the labor market as weakening more quickly than headline inflation data suggests, with negative real wages and disappointing hiring numbers. She warned the current environment is unlikely to absorb another rate hike quietly.
Bianco adopted a more measured stance, noting that labor market cooling appeared to be driven by reduced hiring rather than widespread layoffs—signaling normalization instead of contraction. She suggested the Fed would need to observe several more months of weak job growth before reassessing its policy stance.
Johnson remarked that the Fed’s dual mandate—balancing stable prices and full employment—forces policymakers to weigh both sides carefully, especially as the Trump administration’s immigration tightening may further reduce the available labor pool.
The juxtaposition of firm inflation and signs of slowing employment growth complicates the outlook for the next policy moves.
| Indicator | September Result | Expectation |
|---|---|---|
| Jobs Added | 29,000 | 90,000 |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2% | — |
| Headline CPI (YoY) | 3.7% | 3.4% (prior) |
| Core CPI (YoY) | 2.6% | 2.4% (prior) |
| Brent Crude | $113/barrel | — |
December decision hinges on upcoming data
Market participants continue to expect another rate increase by December, though experts remain divided on the outlook. Shuchart estimated the market is assigning nearly a 90% probability to a December hike but advised skepticism regarding such certainty.
Boyle described his base case as a “hawkish hold” in October, but stressed that December remains undecided, with key influences likely to come from upcoming inflation, employment, and geopolitical developments such as oil market stability.
Bianco and Homkes agreed that continued high inflation and a steady labor market could justify a December rate increase, but moderating wage growth or an easing in inflation expectations might prompt a pause.
The data released in the weeks between the October and December meetings—including employment and CPI reports—are expected to be decisive, especially since the December meeting will feature updated economic projections from the Fed.
As of now, markets overwhelmingly expect a rate hold in October as policymakers assess whether to prioritize containing persistent inflation or to respond more cautiously to signs of labor market weakness.
Mini dictionary: BondBloxx — A financial services company specializing in fixed-income exchange-traded funds, offering investors targeted exposure to bond markets.
