Joseph Lubin, a co-founder of Ethereum and chairman of SharpLink, argues that companies stand to gain more by accumulating Ethereum (ETH) 
$3,139 rather than Bitcoin (BTC) 
$91,967. In an interview with Bloomberg, Lubin shared that SharpLink consistently converts its capital into ETH and utilizes various decentralized finance (DeFi) opportunities to enhance its holdings. According to Lubin, Ethereum’s efficiency and active earning potential make ETH accumulation strategically advantageous.
SharpLink’s ETH Approach
Joseph Lubin emphasized their strategy’s alignment with Michael Saylor’s model while asserting that Ethereum offers superior advantages. Lubin explained their practice of daily converting their capital into Ether, instantly staking or restaking to generate income. This method enables the company to directly augment its ETH reserves.
“Michael Saylor executed his strategy brilliantly. Doing the same and more with Ether is superior because it’s productive and yield-generating. We accumulate capital in various ways daily, convert it to Ether, stake or restake it, and leverage decentralized financial opportunities for growth. We believe we have more significant potential to accumulate more Ether per share than any other Ethereum or Bitcoin-based project.”
Active Investment and Revenue Opportunities
Lubin points out that Ether’s function as more than a value store, providing both security enhancements and income potential, attracts companies. SharpLink strives to increase its present capital daily, converting assets to Ether and staking them directly. The company expands its portfolio with ventures such as ATM facilities and the earnings from these Ether stakes.
“We attempt to increase our capital every day through ATM facilities and other revenue mechanisms, acquiring more Ether nearly daily and immediately staking it.”
This strategy not only helps companies accumulate ETH assets but also allows them to explore the diverse yield opportunities offered by decentralized finance. Lubin emphasizes that staking Ether assets and leveraging various DeFi applications provide a growth potential beyond passive accumulation.
Ethereum vs. Bitcoin Treasuries
Lubin highlights significant differences between Ethereum and Bitcoin treasuries. Specifically, Ether’s characteristic as a “productive” asset with potential continuous income through staking and similar methods makes it a unique choice for corporate treasuries. Bitcoin lacks such a direct yield model.
Lubin’s insights suggest that Ethereum presents a more active and income-focused approach compared to the traditional BTC accumulation strategies of companies. The decentralized finance ecosystem built on Ethereum offers a broad spectrum for companies to maximize their funds.
In recent years, the increasing institutional use of digital assets reflects strategic preferences between assets like ETH and BTC. Lubin’s approach indicates that the active management and additional revenue advantages of Ethereum treasury models could attract various institutions. When deciding between ETH and BTC strategies, readers might consider aspects like productivity and additional yield. Income opportunities offered by the held asset can make a significant difference in digital asset accumulation strategies.
