Türkçe
Español
The 2025 National Guidance and Institution Building Act for Stablecoins (GENIUS Act), passed by a 66 to 32 vote, marks a significant step toward comprehensive federal crypto regulation in the U.S. If enacted, the bill will provide stablecoins with clear definitions, oversight, and capital adequacy standards at a federal level for the first time. Before the vote, ethical debates surrounding the Trump family’s USD1 cryptocurrency gained momentum, leading to bipartisan negotiations. Thanks to transparency enhancements demanded by Democratic senators, Congress leaders highlighted the bill’s aim to strengthen financial stability and boost investor confidence.
Senate Voting Dynamics
The bill initially faced criticism for allegedly granting immunity to the Trump-backed World Liberty Foundation’s USD1 stablecoin. Democratic Senator John Smith argued that aligning national legislation with a former president’s commercial interests would harm public conscience and called for changes. The Republican majority, however, emphasized that private sector innovation should not fall prey to political debates. The final draft included a clause requiring the disclosure of direct or indirect stablecoin investments by White House and Congress members to prevent conflicts of interest, shifting the balance.
In the second procedural vote on Monday night, five Democrats who were initially “abstaining” voted in favor, surpassing the 60-vote threshold. Senate Finance Committee Chair Emily Johnson advocated for bipartisan consensus, stating that outlining rules was more prudent than penalizing complex financial products individually. The White House implicitly supported the bill through a prepared report, although it is anticipated to face new objections as it moves through the House of Representatives in the coming weeks.
Implications of the New Framework for the Sector
The GENIUS Act limits stablecoin issuance to bank-licensed institutions and requires reserve assets to be 100% cash or Treasury bonds. The U.S. Treasury Department will handle annual audits, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will have consumer protection authority, ending the era of patchwork state regulations. According to analysts, international funds entering the U.S.-licensed stablecoin market could increase liquidity and reduce transaction costs.
Critics argue that it may take years for tech companies to obtain bank-like licenses, posing the risk that innovative ventures may be sidelined. On the other hand, regulatory clarity may reduce hesitation among large institutions. A report by MacroSight, a New York-based digital asset research firm, predicts that “legal certainty could double stablecoin trading volume within 18 months.” However, privacy-focused communities warn that while the transparency of reserves is necessary for accountability, it may lead to excessive bureaucracy. The implementation timeline will extend over the 12 months following approval, with a phased transition process requiring existing issuances to relicense.
Post-Senate approval, market players have already begun assessing business models and compliance costs. Global platforms are particularly debating how new license types might offer advantages over passport-free access. America’s reserve strength and financial centrality appear to be attracting stablecoin projects into a Washington-centric regulatory ecosystem.
