Cardano’s (ADA) price has caught attention by rising above $0.70, marking a 12.2% increase over the week. This surge has led to heightened discussions about Cardano 
$0.765618 potentially gaining a competitive edge due to concerns regarding Ethereum’s stability and longevity. Market enthusiasm has also brought Ethereum’s scalability and governance issues into sharper focus.
Concerns Over Ethereum’s Future
Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, has made statements suggesting that Ethereum 
$2,565 may face significant challenges in the long run. He asserts that structural problems within Ethereum, including its dependency on layer-2 solutions and centralization risks, could weaken the network in future years. If these technical issues are not addressed, Ethereum might encounter severe structural problems by 2040.
“Without fundamental reform, Ethereum could risk degradation by 2040.” – Hoskinson.
Performance of Ethereum’s Rivals
Ethereum’s scalability concerns and slow development pace may open the door for other platforms to capture more market share. Competitors like Avalanche, Solana 
$172, Polkadot, NEAR Protocol, and Algorand are experiencing increased transaction volumes and institutional interest, bolstering their competitive standing. With ongoing ETF applications and rising prices, these platforms could present robust alternatives for future investors.
Avalanche is currently trading at $22.43 after a weekly increase of 12%, while Solana has seen a 6.9% rise. Polkadot’s value is up by 10% to $4.27, and NEAR Protocol and Algorand have surged by 21% and 18.8%, respectively. The growing interest from institutional investors has the potential to shape market trends significantly.
Ethereum’s transition has yet to deliver the expected improvements in scalability and cost. This market uncertainty has allowed rival platforms to strengthen, increasing Cardano’s value. However, Ethereum still remains the largest altcoin by market capitalization, and metrics like total locked value, network activity, and user counts demonstrate that no competitor has come close to Ethereum’s scale. Hoskinson’s comments should be considered in the context of potential conflicts of interest.
In the current climate, if Ethereum’s structural issues persist, competition is likely to intensify. Alternative platforms could particularly capture investor interest due to growing institutional engagement and ETF applications.
